The Gulf oil spill is a tragic disaster. Birds, fish and wildlife are not the only ones effected. Residents not just on the coast, but near the coast, are reporting oily-like, gas odors in the air that can cause headaches and nausea. Basically, the air quality in these parts is going to be worse than living next to a gas station.
Staying indoors may not offer much help because over time outdoor air permeates indoors.
Healthy Living Spaces can perform air quality testing for these chemical odors and offer some advice on reducing the levels and making the indoor air healthier to breathe. One way is to use an air purifier that has a ton of carbon in it. Carbon is what traps chemicals. Don't be fooled by gimicks and gadgets that claim to clean the whole house. You need to keep that air purifier in your bedroom or office and run it a high speed. It's got to have a fan and move a lot of air through the carbon media. The only brand we recommend is the IQAir Healthy Pro plus.
Next, it also helps to have a whole house air filter. It too, must have a ton of carbon to remove any odors and chemicals. Remember, a HEPA filter is nice but a HEPA filter removes dust particles, not odors. You need both - a HEPA with carbon.
Contact Healthy Living Spaces for more information and product recommendations or read all about how you can choose and install an whole-house air purifir that makes the air healthy to breathe in the new edition of Dan Stih's Healthy Living Spaces: Top 10 Hazards Effecting Your Health, available on Amazon.com.
Read chapter: Recommendations - Furnace filters, Air Purifiers.
Wednesday, June 23, 2010
EPA requires tetsing of homes built before 1978
If you have a contractor do remodeling work in your home, and your home was built before 1978, the contractor must notify you of new EPA rules governing renovation work as follows.
To protect against this risk, on April 22, 2008, EPA issued a rule requiring the use of lead-safe practices and other actions aimed at preventing lead poisoning. Under the rule, beginning April 22, 2010, contractors performing renovation, repair and painting projects that disturb lead-based paint in homes, child care facilities, and schools built before 1978 must be certified and must follow specific work practices to prevent lead contamination.
EPA requires that firms performing renovation, repair, and painting projects that disturb lead-based paint in pre-1978 homes, child care facilities and schools be certified by EPA and that they use certified renovators who are trained by EPA-approved training providers to follow lead-safe work practices. Individuals can become certified renovators by taking an eight-hour training course from an EPA-approved training provider.Healthy Living Spaces has a certified EPA Lead Dust Sampling Technician on staff that can perform post-renovation testing in your home to verify hazardous levels of lead are not present after the contractor is done. Contact:
Healthy Living Spaces LLC
www.healthylivingspaces.com
Santa Fe (serving all New Mexico and surrounding areas)
(505) 992-9905
Call for an appointment
Thursday, December 24, 2009
Shame on the Indian Pueblo Council
It was sad to see the army blowing up the ancient tress in local natives lived on in the new film Avatar. Unfortunately in real life it's sometimes the natives destroying nature. This scene reminded me of the mass cutting of tress this year at the Indian School in Santa Fe, New Mexico.
In a desert climate where shade should be a treasure, the school cut down dozens of beautiful trees, some of them more than a half century old, leaving the old campus littered with stumps. The cutting was done stealthy before any white people could complain (not that we could stop it anyhow)
The all Indian Pueblo Council, made up of governors from the 19 New Mexico pueblos was responsible for making the decision to cut down the trees. And they had them cut quickly before anyone could complain or stop the tragedy.
Driving by the property, one can feel the pain and loss of the tress and the land.
School officials declined to say what they would do with the area, though two development plans have surfaced for a hotel and retail shops.
Ironically, since Congress requires the land be used for "educational, health or cultural purposes, the shopping malls can not be built after all. I'm sure the tress will make sure the land is cursed forever.
Shame on the Pueblo Council members.
Monday, November 19, 2007
Global Warming Fear-Mongering
RE: Can Global Warming Worsen Allergies? (Published in the New Mexican, Monday, November 19, 2007)
The article “Can Global Warming Worsen Allergies?” appears to be taken straight out of a press-release from the NRDC with little or no investigative reporting done by the New Mexican.
It opens with the fear-mongering statement “Global warming can make allergies worse simply because the major pollen producers that trigger allergic reactions thrive and flourish in warmer air.”
Yes, everything grows faster with global warming, including crops for food and tress. And it’s not because of warmer temperatures – it’s because of the sun! And this is not necessary a bad thing because tress consume carbon dioxide and purifier the air.
It goes on to instill even more fear in those with allergies by stating “carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions contribute to smog, another trigger for asthma”. Yes, carbon dioxide is produced by burning coal, gasoline and natural gas. But carbon dioxide is not allergenic and is not toxic. When you burn candles on your kitchen table carbon dioxide is produced. A gas space heater burning at 100% combustion efficiency in your home will be spew out carbon dioxide continuously. This is not be confused with carbon monoxide and chemicals in smog that are produced when things don’t burn clean. The only way to not have carbon dioxide is to not burn anything and to not breathe. A few people huddled into in a small living space in the winter probably exhale more carbon dioxide than the heating appliances produce.
My company is in the business of helping people with allergy problems. These people are suffering and need accurate and useful information to help them with their plight – not fear mongering propaganda disseminated from organizations claiming that that global warming is to blame for everything.
Ultimately, the only way to prevent carbon dioxide is to not burn anything and to stop breathing. Solar power can’t supply us with enough power to eliminate coal and natural gas. That leaves nuclear power as our savior, a horrible alternative, and possibly the hidden agenda behind this fear mongering report. Before we consider nuclear power maybe we should consider that is it the sun - not CO2 causing global warming and that CO2 is a natural gas produced by all living organisms that makes things grow.
The article “Can Global Warming Worsen Allergies?” appears to be taken straight out of a press-release from the NRDC with little or no investigative reporting done by the New Mexican.
It opens with the fear-mongering statement “Global warming can make allergies worse simply because the major pollen producers that trigger allergic reactions thrive and flourish in warmer air.”
Yes, everything grows faster with global warming, including crops for food and tress. And it’s not because of warmer temperatures – it’s because of the sun! And this is not necessary a bad thing because tress consume carbon dioxide and purifier the air.
It goes on to instill even more fear in those with allergies by stating “carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions contribute to smog, another trigger for asthma”. Yes, carbon dioxide is produced by burning coal, gasoline and natural gas. But carbon dioxide is not allergenic and is not toxic. When you burn candles on your kitchen table carbon dioxide is produced. A gas space heater burning at 100% combustion efficiency in your home will be spew out carbon dioxide continuously. This is not be confused with carbon monoxide and chemicals in smog that are produced when things don’t burn clean. The only way to not have carbon dioxide is to not burn anything and to not breathe. A few people huddled into in a small living space in the winter probably exhale more carbon dioxide than the heating appliances produce.
My company is in the business of helping people with allergy problems. These people are suffering and need accurate and useful information to help them with their plight – not fear mongering propaganda disseminated from organizations claiming that that global warming is to blame for everything.
Ultimately, the only way to prevent carbon dioxide is to not burn anything and to stop breathing. Solar power can’t supply us with enough power to eliminate coal and natural gas. That leaves nuclear power as our savior, a horrible alternative, and possibly the hidden agenda behind this fear mongering report. Before we consider nuclear power maybe we should consider that is it the sun - not CO2 causing global warming and that CO2 is a natural gas produced by all living organisms that makes things grow.
Tuesday, June 26, 2007
Information on Pesticides
A very good site for news related to pesticides:
http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/
see also:
http://www.pesticide.org/factsheets.html
http://pesticides.org/
http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/
see also:
http://www.pesticide.org/factsheets.html
http://pesticides.org/
Thursday, June 14, 2007
Valles Caldera = No Access for poor
In response to “Grande Experience”, an article in the Go! Section of the Albuquerque Journal about the Valles Caldera National Preserve in the Jemez:
This monument reeks of capitalism like the US Forest Service Fee Demo Program reeks of corporate profiteering.
It’s a contradiction to establish a “preserve” and then depend on it becoming financially self-sustaining, as the Valles Caldera is required to do by the year 2010. The preserve admits to having limited parking to avoid too much human impact yet it has a goal of increasing the amount of visitors by 15% each year.
Deliberately marketing to increase visitation while limiting access means that the cost of entering the preserve will have to increase in the future, making it impossible for low-income families to attend.
What the Valles Caldera is doing is similar to the US Forest Service Fee Demo Program. Under this program, the fees to do simple things like having a picnic in the park have tripled over the past few years, resulting in less people using the parks. At the same time the forest Service continues to spend money to advertise with goals of increased visitors. The visitors that come pay money and therefore expect to have an experience similar to Disney Land (for more information on this google “Fee Demo” or look at sites like Arizona No Fee Coalition and wildwilderness.org).
A preserve should be just that. Leave it alone. Allow access to users as if it were public lands, BLM or nation forest. If something is truly a preserve, there should be no new infrastructures or marketing of new activities.
This monument reeks of capitalism like the US Forest Service Fee Demo Program reeks of corporate profiteering.
It’s a contradiction to establish a “preserve” and then depend on it becoming financially self-sustaining, as the Valles Caldera is required to do by the year 2010. The preserve admits to having limited parking to avoid too much human impact yet it has a goal of increasing the amount of visitors by 15% each year.
Deliberately marketing to increase visitation while limiting access means that the cost of entering the preserve will have to increase in the future, making it impossible for low-income families to attend.
What the Valles Caldera is doing is similar to the US Forest Service Fee Demo Program. Under this program, the fees to do simple things like having a picnic in the park have tripled over the past few years, resulting in less people using the parks. At the same time the forest Service continues to spend money to advertise with goals of increased visitors. The visitors that come pay money and therefore expect to have an experience similar to Disney Land (for more information on this google “Fee Demo” or look at sites like Arizona No Fee Coalition and wildwilderness.org).
A preserve should be just that. Leave it alone. Allow access to users as if it were public lands, BLM or nation forest. If something is truly a preserve, there should be no new infrastructures or marketing of new activities.
Sunday, June 10, 2007
Invasion of "Monster" Towers
The Santa Fe New Mexican did a story today on the Public Service Company installing huge steel towers for power lines along Rufina street and Zafarano Drive. The 60-foot high, 3-foot thick towers replaced smaller ones that were reportedly 50 years old.
Some local residents are concerned. This might be justified. But, while the bigger towers look scary, if the old lines are replaced, residents may in fact be exposed to lower magnetic fields than before.
A magnetic field is created when electrical current flows. As more current flows, a bigger magnetic field is created. As demand for power increases more current must flow on the lines for a given voltage.
Voltage is energy. Image the energy in something compared to dropping a baseball from a tall building. The higher you drop the ball the more energy it will have on impact. To get the same amount of energy from dropping one ball from 100 feet you would need to drop 10 balls from 10 feet.
Power lines are the same way. You can either run less current on higher voltage lines (big and scary looking ones), or more current on smaller power lines (the old lines). The old power lines reportedly carried 45 kilovolts; the newer ones 115 kilovolts. Thus, the newer lines can provide the same amount of power with less than half the current.
Some residents have asked that the lines be buried underground, in which case the magnetic fields would be nearly zero. Contrary to popular belief, this is not because putting them under ground shields us from them. Magnetic fields are not blocked by dirt, steel or concrete. The reason burring them eliminates fields is because the lines are closer together underground; on the tower the lines are several feet apart.
Why do we care? There has been some debate over the heath effects caused by magnetic fields associated with power lines. However, most scientists agree that they affect us biologically. Laboratory studies have reported changes in hormones including melatonin, bio-rhythms, brain activity, heart rate and alterations in the immune system (1).In related news, it was reported that PNM is now requesting the right to run power lines through parks and over trails without having to ask for approval. Currently they need the approval of City Council.
Parks and trails don't belong under or near power lines, yet this is often the case because it's a cheap way for municipalities to get space. Utility companies often donate or lease land for as low as $1 a year.
PNM may say they can’t afford to bury power lines underground. What they really mean is 1) stock holders won’t approve unnecessary spending; and 2) if they bury lines under the perception of a health risk they will open the flood gates –everywhere people would insist that power lines by their homes be buried.
In most cases, burring lines is not necessary to avoid exposure. It is surprising how quickly the magnetic fields emanated from power lines drops off with distance away from the lines. In most cases, burying the lines is not necessary to avoid exposure inside a building. This is not the case in parks and open spaces where people may actually hike under or be very close to them. These power lines should be buried.
References
1 Questions and Answers About EMF, Electric and Magnetic Fields Associated with the Use of Electric Power, National Institute of Environmental Health Services and U.S. Department of Energy, U.S Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C, January, 1995, p.23.
Related Stories:
Parents lead fight against power line -
High-voltage proposal mobilizes Greene County residents; more research urged on health effects of electromagnetic fields
Sunday, June 24, 2007By Janice Crompton, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Some local residents are concerned. This might be justified. But, while the bigger towers look scary, if the old lines are replaced, residents may in fact be exposed to lower magnetic fields than before.
A magnetic field is created when electrical current flows. As more current flows, a bigger magnetic field is created. As demand for power increases more current must flow on the lines for a given voltage.
Voltage is energy. Image the energy in something compared to dropping a baseball from a tall building. The higher you drop the ball the more energy it will have on impact. To get the same amount of energy from dropping one ball from 100 feet you would need to drop 10 balls from 10 feet.
Power lines are the same way. You can either run less current on higher voltage lines (big and scary looking ones), or more current on smaller power lines (the old lines). The old power lines reportedly carried 45 kilovolts; the newer ones 115 kilovolts. Thus, the newer lines can provide the same amount of power with less than half the current.
Some residents have asked that the lines be buried underground, in which case the magnetic fields would be nearly zero. Contrary to popular belief, this is not because putting them under ground shields us from them. Magnetic fields are not blocked by dirt, steel or concrete. The reason burring them eliminates fields is because the lines are closer together underground; on the tower the lines are several feet apart.
Why do we care? There has been some debate over the heath effects caused by magnetic fields associated with power lines. However, most scientists agree that they affect us biologically. Laboratory studies have reported changes in hormones including melatonin, bio-rhythms, brain activity, heart rate and alterations in the immune system (1).In related news, it was reported that PNM is now requesting the right to run power lines through parks and over trails without having to ask for approval. Currently they need the approval of City Council.
Parks and trails don't belong under or near power lines, yet this is often the case because it's a cheap way for municipalities to get space. Utility companies often donate or lease land for as low as $1 a year.
PNM may say they can’t afford to bury power lines underground. What they really mean is 1) stock holders won’t approve unnecessary spending; and 2) if they bury lines under the perception of a health risk they will open the flood gates –everywhere people would insist that power lines by their homes be buried.
In most cases, burring lines is not necessary to avoid exposure. It is surprising how quickly the magnetic fields emanated from power lines drops off with distance away from the lines. In most cases, burying the lines is not necessary to avoid exposure inside a building. This is not the case in parks and open spaces where people may actually hike under or be very close to them. These power lines should be buried.
References
1 Questions and Answers About EMF, Electric and Magnetic Fields Associated with the Use of Electric Power, National Institute of Environmental Health Services and U.S. Department of Energy, U.S Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C, January, 1995, p.23.
Related Stories:
Parents lead fight against power line -
High-voltage proposal mobilizes Greene County residents; more research urged on health effects of electromagnetic fields
Sunday, June 24, 2007By Janice Crompton, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)